[hafqa] [hafqa] [Bug 814] INVALID_CHAR defined twice

From: bugzilla-daemon at maemo.org bugzilla-daemon at maemo.org
Date: Wed Nov 8 21:25:09 EET 2006
https://maemo.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=814


tommi.komulainen at nokia.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tommi.komulainen at nokia.com




------- Additional Comments From tommi.komulainen at nokia.com  2006-11-08 21:25 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> shouldn't it be like this to avoid future conflicts, and to be more consistent
> with other G APIs?:

Yes. Though we might want to drop a couple of prefixes to keep things more
convenient and general, at least in theory. Similar to some gtk enums. Something
like:
HILDON_DATE_NO_ERROR,
HILDON_DATE_INVALID_CHAR, ...

Or perhaps combine the two enums as:
HILDON_DATETIME_NO_ERROR,
HILDON_DATETIME_MAX_SECONDS,
HILDON_DATETIME_MAX_DAY, ...

No strong feelings though.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://maemo.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

More information about the hafqa mailing list