[hafqa] [hafqa] [Bug 814] INVALID_CHAR defined twice

From: bugzilla-daemon at maemo.org bugzilla-daemon at maemo.org
Date: Thu Nov 16 23:41:05 EET 2006
https://maemo.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=814





------- Additional Comments From danielk at openismus.com  2006-11-16 23:41 -------
Er, I didn't interpret the words "perhaps" and "no strong feelings" in Tommi's
comment as voicing a preference for combining the two enumerations.  Thus the
current patch implements his first proposal.

Also, I agree with Murray that there is no real semantic overlap between the two
enumerations.  I think it defeats the purpose of enumeration *types* to define
enumeration constants whose validity depends on the usage context, despite
belonging to the same enumeration type.  Not to mention that in order to do this
cleanly, the enumeration would have to be moved into a third header file.  As a
result the type merge would lead to increased complexity, rather than reducing
it as was probably the original intend.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://maemo.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

More information about the hafqa mailing list