[maemo-community] [maemo2midgard] Re: Application catalog feature request
From: Ferenc Szekely ferenc.szekely at nokia.comDate: Fri Nov 24 14:41:58 EET 2006
- Previous message: [maemo2midgard] Re: Application catalog feature request
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hola, ext Guillem Jover wrote: > I think the catalogue thingy in general is a workaround for the lacking > of a proper repository where the "community" can upload packages after > whatever reviewing steps may be needed, or whatever trust has been > given to known members of such community. > Might be a workaround, but it is there, pretty concrete and not just an urban legend like some other tools we have been discussing in the past ;) > Also some of those "ports" are just recompilations, which I grant is > Debian's "fault" (or ours depending on how we look at it ;) for not > providing an armel arch, this should be comming soon now, I hope. > This will be great, if it happens. > > Supported already by packages.d.o. > > There's also: > > <http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/cloud/> > <http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/ssearch.html> > <http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/fts.html> > ... > >> I don't remember where I read, but I think you can also organize >> dedicated changelog repos Guillem might know more > > <http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/dbus/current/changelog> > <http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/dbus/current/copyright> > Do these tools work with dak, or are they using the dak database? If yes, then I will not bother checking them (reason: we have no dak). If no, then please point me to the sources of these tools. > regards, > guillem Cheers, ferenc
- Previous message: [maemo2midgard] Re: Application catalog feature request
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]