[maemo-community] Maemo Site

[From: Tim]

Sorry, I guess I breezed over that part of Andrew's email... I also
agree that it should be Maemo Community (sans council). I'm assuming
that there's someone at Nokia Legal we could iron this up with?

Tim
--- Original message follows ---
SUBJECT: Re: Maemo Site
FROM:  Dave Neary 
TO: "Andrew Flegg" 
CC: "Tim" ,"List for community development" ,"Glaubert Oliveira"
,"Andre Cunha" 
DATE: 12/07/2008 12:46 pm
Hi,

Andrew Flegg wrote:
> One thing which my early template had, and the HTML should contain
is
> that the footer should NOT say "Copyright .... Nokia Corporation".
I
> think the terminology I came up with was:
> 
>    "Copyright (c) Maemo Community Council, Nokia Corporation &
others
>     2005-$YEAR"

"Copyright... others" is too vague to my mind.

You might get away with "Copyright Maemo Community and Nokia
Corporation" or something similar (brain muddle right now, can't
think
up something better).

> The ordering representing that the community (embodied in the
Council)
> are
the primary authors of the site - especially important when
> maemo.nokia.com comes along.

I do have a problem with the Maemo Community Council being designated
as
a copyright holder too - it's not like there is a corporation. If
we're
going to say "Maemo council", why not just say "Maemo community"?

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
maemo.org docsmaster
Email: dneary at maemo.org
Jabber: bolsh at jabber.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-community/attachments/20081207/a0b4d991/attachment.htm