[maemo-community] [Bugsquad] Bugzilla Version scheme
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Tue Sep 30 13:04:50 EEST 2008
- Previous message: [Bugsquad] Bugzilla Version scheme
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Andre Klapper <aklapper at openismus.com> wrote: > > > Hence my current proposal is to use a long (but less error-prone) > Version and Target Milestone string like "4.1-2 (4.2008.36-5)" instead > of current "4.1.2" (note the hyphen instead of the dot), but I wonder if > that brings up other problems if Nokia decides to also provide flash > images (and introduce their own versioning scheme for theme, like "4.2") > in addition to SSU updates. The problem I can see with pretty much any approach (whilst Nokia releases are sprung on us like this), is that any naming scheme is going to have risk of not matching. Obviously the release version year & week aren't going to be known ahead of time. There's even a problem with 4.1-2 (2nd release of 4.1), though. Ahead of time, we don't know if the next version is in the 4.1 series, or 4.2. Is it easy to rename versions? Perhaps it should be "<latest version>+1", i.e. the next version is known, in Bugzilla, as "4.1.1+1" until it's released; then it is renamed to the appropriate version (say 4.1.2). The next iteration would then be "4.1.2+1". Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ maemo.org Community Council member
- Previous message: [Bugsquad] Bugzilla Version scheme
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]