[maemo-community] [Proposal] - Developers should get karma based on the relevance of their software
From: Dave Neary dneary at maemo.orgDate: Tue Dec 1 11:48:10 EET 2009
- Next message: [Proposal] - Developers should get karma based on the relevance of their software
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, Valerio Valerio wrote: > We need to reach a decision for this proposal[1]. > > "Currently it's easier to get plenty of karma blogging about apps, > talking about apps and commenting bugs in apps... but at the end are the > developers who carry with a lot of the hard work. Let's praise them!" - > Quim Gil > > There's already some good points/solutions in the brainstorm page and in > the related discussion at TMO[1] (Warning a lot of 'sparks' there :) ). > > IMO the solution with more potential so far is "#6 Measure existing > userbase via updates"[3], of course it needs some tweaks[4][5]. One idea which hasn't been discussed is that we could increase appplication development related karma, or reduce talk/blog/email related karma, to give a bigger influence to application development. In general, I think that using downloads has a few merits - notably, it's the easiest to apply, which is a concern. App karma is intended to measure relevance over time, so why not have it added to maintainers karma (but then, the maintainers karma can/should go down over time - is that OK?). I see that Quim's already asked those questions in that Talk thread. It seems to me like measuring the peak height is a bit trickier, and has the same problem that the karma from the app can go up or down over time. Cheers, Dave. -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: dneary at maemo.org Jabber: bolsh at jabber.org
- Next message: [Proposal] - Developers should get karma based on the relevance of their software
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]