[maemo-community] Should we restart the Unicode voting?
From: Dave Neary dneary at maemo.orgDate: Thu Dec 3 11:50:56 EET 2009
- Previous message: Should we restart the Unicode voting?
- Next message: Should we restart the Unicode voting?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, Andrew Flegg wrote: > Obvious question here is whether this is direct keys, blue-arrow keys > or characters in the palette. I'm assuming it's to determine the > relative placement of all three. Looking at the N900 keyboard, it seems most likely to be blue-arrow keys. >> $ % & ( ) < = > \ _ | ~ £ € > > I thought there was an argument that the currency symbols should be > removed as within a market they're important (perhaps less so to a > savvy user, but I can imagine the reviews if a UK device doesn't show > a pound sign), but a lot less so outside that market. It's probably > also worth saying that all these keys would be accessible *somehow*. Funny enough the "pound" symbol is # for most Americans, since on uk keyboards £ is in the same place as #. I had feedback from several voters that $ is important for shell users, in spite of being non-Americans. I guess this will depend on the size of the markets & the cost of producing different keyboards more than our opinion :) > Also, I'd suggest very carefully controlled test. Given the > multi-regions receiving the email, the character encoding should be > UTF-8, and this may require a change to the vote email sending thing. We can blame the Mail::Internet perl module. Do we need to add an extra header line to make the mail specify UTF8 encoding? Cheers, Dave. -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: dneary at maemo.org Jabber: bolsh at jabber.org
- Previous message: Should we restart the Unicode voting?
- Next message: Should we restart the Unicode voting?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]