[maemo-community] Election process referendum
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Wed Feb 4 00:54:03 EET 2009
- Previous message: Election process referendum
- Next message: Election process referendum
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Jac Kersing <j.kersing at the-box.com> wrote: > > Please excuse my butting in, however I would like to ask a serious > question: No excusing necessary. > Whom do you think might be more knowledgable and (imho) in a better > position to vote on council members: > 1) Someone reading the various maemo lists, including the discussions on > this list. > 2) Someone posting development related questions on the maemo-developers > list. > 3) Someone rating downloadable software on maemo.org. It's a good point. There are two answers, I can see: 1) This is the fundamental problem with karma, and so the requirement should be scrapped. 2) This is a minor hole in the current karma calculation you've identifed, and so someone should get points for being subscribed to a mailing list (n for being subscribed, 0.6n for being subscribed with the digest, say). What do _you_ think? Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ Maemo Community Council member
- Previous message: Election process referendum
- Next message: Election process referendum
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]