[maemo-community] Proposed referenda on election processes
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Thu Feb 12 13:00:34 EET 2009
- Previous message: Organizing Maemo Summit 2009
- Next message: Proposed referenda on election processes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, Following on from the<http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-community/2009-January/002918.html> earlier<http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-community/2009-January/002947.html>threads, I propose *THREE* referenda for debate during the next week: 1. Voting requirements for the NEXT election. 2. Voting requirements for N+1 & future elections. 3. Vote counting system for future elections. Here's the detail of each with reference to the changes needed to: http://wiki.maemo.org/Community_Council#Election_Process *Referendum #1: Eligibility for the next election only* *a)* 25 karma minimum and 3 month old account (status quo) Item #3 remains as "Only community members who have had maemo.org accounts for over 3 months, and have karma of 25 or above, may vote." *b)* Karma ignored, account age ignored (council preferred option) Item #3 becomes "Only community members who have had maemo.org accounts for over 3 months, and have karma of 25 or above, may vote. *(Exception for first two elections: community members who have maemo.org accounts for over 3 months may vote - no karma requirement)*" This option is preferred by the Maemo Community Council to encourage a greater participation and uptake of maemo.org accounts, before the talk.maemo.org transition and launch of the revamped website. *c)* Neither of the above. No change is made to the election process, and so please be aware this is a vote for option (a). However, it does allow you to indicate that you think neither were satisfactory. *Referendum #2: Eligibility for future elections* *a)* 25 karma minimum and 3 month old account (status quo) Item #3 remains as "Only community members who have had maemo.org accounts for over 3 months, and have karma of 25 or above, may vote." *b)* 10 karma point minimum and 3 month old account Item #3 becomes as "Only community members who have had maemo.org accounts for over 3 months, and have karma of *10* or above, may vote." *c)* 10 karma point minimum or 12 month old account Item #3 becomes as "Only community members who have had maemo.org accounts for over *12* months, *or* have karma of *10* or above, may vote." *d)* Karma ignored, account age ignored Item #3 becomes as "*Anybody with a maemo.org account will be entitled to a vote.*" *e)* None of the above. No change is made to the election process, and so please be aware this is a vote for option (a). However, it does allow you to indicate that you think none of these options is satisfactory. *Referendum #3: Voting system for council elections* *a)* No change ("first-five-candidates-past-the-post") Item #4 remains "Each community member gets one vote.". Item #5 remains "The 5 nominees with the most votes are elected." *b)* A single transferrable vote system (rank your preferred candidates) [council preferred option] Item #4 becomes "Each community member *eligible to vote gets a single ballot.*" Item #5 becomes "The 5 nominees *voted for most, as counted by a single transferrable vote system are elected.*" This option is preferred by the Maemo Community Council as being easiest to understand and gives a satisfactory outcome. *c)* A reweighted range voting system (give *each* candidate a score 0-100) Item #4 becomes "Each community member *eligible to vote gets a single ballot.*" Item #5 becomes "The 5 nominees *ranked highest by a reweighted range voting system are elected.*" *d)* None of the above. No change is made to the election process, and so please be aware this is a vote for option (a). However, it does allow you to indicate that you think none of these options is satisfactory. I suggest discussion and debate on these options until *Monday, 16th Feburary* - and then the referendum starts (debate for a month, then voting). According to the current rules, only people with karma of 25 or more may vote in the referendum. Cheers, Andrew PS. Sorry for the HTML email, I wanted to use the formatting to clarify the changes. -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ Maemo Community Council member -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-community/attachments/20090212/5b623753/attachment.htm
- Previous message: Organizing Maemo Summit 2009
- Next message: Proposed referenda on election processes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]