[maemo-community] Referendum misleading summary
From: Dave Neary dneary at maemo.orgDate: Wed Feb 18 12:09:15 EET 2009
- Previous message: Referendum misleading summary
- Next message: Referendum misleading summary
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, Niels has modified the choice in the database, and I have modified the wiki page in consequence. I think that we're still OK, as you point out, the proposed changes were correct, and the description didn't match. It's not like we're moving the goalposts during the match, more like we are re-painting them. Cheers, Dave. Andrew Flegg wrote: > Hi, > > Mea culpa (but, meh, none of you noticed it either). qole's pointed > out that the summary & detail of referendum #1's second option are > inconsistent: > > http://wiki.maemo.org/Talk:Community_Council/Voting_rights_Q1_2009 > > Obviously, the specific change in terminology is what would actually > happen (i.e. there is still a three month limit) - which may or may > not have been what the council wanted - but thoughts on what we should > do? The election software shows a single line summary, so votes not > yet cast may be rescuable. > > Cheers, > > Andrew > -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: dneary at maemo.org Jabber: bolsh at jabber.org
- Previous message: Referendum misleading summary
- Next message: Referendum misleading summary
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]