[maemo-community] Application Karma
From: Dave Neary dneary at maemo.orgDate: Tue Feb 24 19:10:09 EET 2009
- Previous message: Application Karma
- Next message: Application Karma
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Patrick, Patrik Hirvinen wrote: > The idea presented at https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2179#c11 > was to simplify things by moving to just faves and burys and use that to > replace the stars' function to decide what's shown on the downloads > front page ( http://maemo.org/downloads/OS2008/ )in the section "Stars" > and on the stars page ( http://maemo.org/downloads/bestrated/OS2008/25/ > ) There are already sections for all-time popular and new apps, plus the > featured ones. This would be used to determine what's hot right now. offering them a way of scaling it either -1 or 1.Aren't stars redundant with faves & buries? It seems to me like giving someone a way to rank an application on a scale of 1 to 5 is better than I thought the whole point of application karma was to mix ideas of quality, popularity and viability to come up with an overall ranking of applications. Was I wrong? > We don't keep data on amount of "recent" downloads. Unless what's really > wanted is to determine an overall score for the whole lifetime of the > application instead of just how hot it's now, this seems overly > complicated. It's difficult to assess what would be a fair or sensible > formula for the first purpose without looking at what kind of scores it > would give for a large amount of typical applications. They're stored somewhere - there's a curve of downloads on a month-by-month basis in maemo.org/downloads when you click on the "Download statistics" link on (say) https://maemo.org/downloads/product/OS2008/phonelink/ I'm suggesting using the last full month's worth of downloads as the "recent downloads" measure. It could just as easily be the last 3 months or the last 6 months. The point is to get an idea of how popular the app has been recently, as opposed to 2 years ago when it was the hot new thing on Bora. As for the coefficients, I agree, they need tweaking to be both simple to implement (for you) and in a reasonable range for the applications. We don't want one app at 10,000 karma while 99% of the apps are under 10. The karma distribution should be like the person karma one. Cheers, Dave. -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: dneary at maemo.org Jabber: bolsh at jabber.org
- Previous message: Application Karma
- Next message: Application Karma
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]