[maemo-community] Why not release the new site
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Thu Feb 26 19:11:24 EET 2009
- Previous message: Why not release the new site
- Next message: Why not release the new site
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Niels Breet <niels at maemo.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Andrew Flegg <andrew at bleb.org> wrote: > >> Dave/Niels/Bergie: please can we also change the template to be used >> across *.maemo.org (including the wiki and Bugzilla) to *not* say, in the >> footer: >> >> Copyright (c) 2002-2009 Nokia Corporation > > To what? :) Damn. I was hoping you'd look it up so I wouldn't have to think about it. IANAL, but does there need to be a definable entity against the copyright attribution? If so, there are 3 basic choices: Copyright (c) 2002-2009 Nokia Corporation and others Copyright (c) 2002-2009 maemo.org Copyright (c) 2002-2009 Maemo Community Council, Nokia Corp. and others ...or variants thereof (the "others" just being a vague bit to make people feel happier). If there's no legal requirement for a discrete, discernible entity then the obvious answer is: Copyright (c) 2002-2009 maemo.org Community Some of these will need some kind of CC-assignment licence for wiki edits, do we have one of those under the T&Cs? Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ Maemo Community Council member
- Previous message: Why not release the new site
- Next message: Why not release the new site
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]