[maemo-community] Sprint meeting & process
From: Niels Breet niels at maemo.orgDate: Thu Jun 18 00:09:05 EEST 2009
- Previous message: Sprint meeting & process
- Next message: Sprint meeting & process
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 16:10, Jeremiah > Foster<jeremiah at jeremiahfoster.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jun 17, 2009, at 16:44, Andrew Flegg wrote: >> >> > However, the point of this discussion is to try and find 1) how to get > people to report their status, 2) whether the wiki is the right place and - > as Dave's raised - 0) why we're reporting status in the first place. > So, what I get from this is: 1. The council doesn't see enough progress on tasks 2. You want better visibility of work being done The question is, are you not satisfied about the work being done? Or not satisfied about the visibility? For myself, I always keep track of my hours with this amount of details: 2009-05-07;2;maemo meeting, updating logs 2009-05-07;1;repository download difficulties 2009-05-07;0.5;opengl-es testing 2009-05-07;2;work on api refs sync 2009-05-07;0.5;repository work 2009-05-07;0.5;screenshot issue 2009-05-07;1;Brainstorm testing/deploying Would that be more helpful for you? There are sometimes things I do in my day to day work that are the boring maintenance work or might be a bit sensitive. What to do in those cases? What should I report when I added 3 feeds to the planet, accepted some garage projects or helped somebody setting up his git repository? Is that really interesting info? I guess this leads to how much detail do you want ;) > > > Cheers, > > > Andrew > > > -- > Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ > Maemo Community Council chair -- Niels Breet maemo.org webmaster
- Previous message: Sprint meeting & process
- Next message: Sprint meeting & process
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]