[maemo-community] STV voting strategy
From: Frantisek Dufka dufkaf at seznam.czDate: Fri Mar 20 15:12:33 EET 2009
- Previous message: STV voting strategy
- Next message: STV voting strategy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dave Neary wrote: > Jaffa has 48 first round votes, the quota is 27. > > We count all of Jaffa's 2nd preferences: ... > We multiply the number of 2nd preferences by 21/48 Ah I see. This is good. So all #2 preferences are counted. My understanding was that since 40% of the votes for Jaffa were surplus this implies that 60% of #2 positions were not considered at all since those people already voted for Jaffa. I am happy I was wrong. > The question is *which* 8 of the 18 votes that were Jaffa 1, Tim 2 (or > Jaffa 1, GA 2, Tim 3, since GA is no longer being considered) get > transferred to Tim's pile. > > This has an incidence if Tim ends up with a surplus, or gets eliminated > later, since in that case, we move down to the next preference on the > ballot, and if there's a ballot that has 1. Jaffa, 2. Tim, 3. sjgadsby, > and another that has 1. Jaffa, 2. Tim, 3. Kees, then depending on which > of the two ballots gets added to Tim's pile, Kees or Stephen end up with > the vote later. Yes, this is disturbing just as described here http://stv.sourceforge.net/votingmethods/random "It is important to note is that changing the order of the ballots can change the outcome of the election. In reality, this will only happen in a close election. However, many people find this aspect disturbing." > > There is another way to count, which only makes sense with electronic > counting (and is thus harder to verify), and that's fractional transfers. ... > We could use fractional transfer if you want Yes please if it makes result less random and more fair. > Yes, this is true. In STV, you are voting primarily to elect your > preferred candidate and ordering is very important. This is what worries me since I need to decide between person A or B while I want both of them. But I'll get used to it :-) Frantisek
- Previous message: STV voting strategy
- Next message: STV voting strategy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]