[maemo-community] Proposed reorganization of documentation bug reporting

From: Jarmo.Tikka at nokia.com Jarmo.Tikka at nokia.com
Date: Tue Apr 20 08:37:14 EEST 2010
Hi,

Any progress on this maemo.org Bugzilla reorganization for documentation bugs?

We now have set of official documents published in Maemo Info Center and it would be nice to have also this Bugzilla cleanup done for them.

Cheers,
//Jarmo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tikka Jarmo (Nokia-D/Helsinki)
> Sent: 15 March, 2010 09:48
> To: maemo-community at maemo.org
> Subject: RE: Proposed reorganization of documentation bug reporting
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks Dave.
> 
> We discussed this reorganization of Bugzilla componetns in private mail
> thread and I just copy-paste my latest reply also to this community
> list.
> 
> I somewhat changed links and descriptions for proposed documentation
> components (my version top posted below).
> 
> Create the following products/subcomponents:
> 
> * Device User Guides & Help
>   * documents delivered together with device or device sales box
> * Developer Guides
>   * maemo.org wiki http://wiki.maemo.org/Documentation/
>   * reviewed version in Maemo Info Center
> http://library.maemodocs.nokia.com/
> * Tutorials
>   * maemo.org wiki http://wiki.maemo.org/Documentation/
>   * reviewed versions in Maemo Info Center
> http://library.maemodocs.nokia.com/
> * API Documents
>   * from sources delivered from maemo.org SDK repositories
> http://repository.maemo.org/
>   * reviewed versions in Maemo Info Center
> http://library.maemodocs.nokia.com/
> * Example Applications
>   * from MaemoExamples Garage project
> http://vcs.maemo.org/svn/maemoexamples/tags/
> 
> Cheers,
> //Jarmo
> 
> > Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:57:07 +0100
> > From: Dave Neary <dneary at maemo.org>
> > Subject: Proposed reorganisation of documentation bug reporting
> > To: List for community development <maemo-community at maemo.org>
> > Message-ID: <4B9A7263.4080206 at maemo.org>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Currently, I get the impression that there is some confusion on how &
> > where to report documentation bugs - they're *supposed* to be
> reported
> > against the SDK, and there's no obvious place to report them against
> > "maemo.org website", which is where I've always looked instinctively.
> >
> > With Andre, Titta & Jarmo, we've come up with this proposal for
> > modifying the documentation bug reporting workflow.
> >
> > First, the existing situation:
> >
> > * General Developer documentation, wiki stuff, etc.
> >  - Should be reported against "Maemo Official Platform" >
> "Development
> > platform"
> >
> > * API references bug reports
> >  - Report against the corresponding product/components and set "docs"
> > keyword
> > * Printed and Electronic On-Device Documentation
> >  - Report against "Maemo Official Platform" > "User guide & Help
> > content"
> >
> >
> > And now, our proposal:
> >
> > 1. Create a top classification named Documentation listed at https://bugs.maemo.org/enter_bug.cgi
> >
> >
> > 2. Create the following products/subcomponents:
> >
> > * Device User Guides & Help
> >  - docs delivered together with device or device sales box
> > * Developer Guides
> >   * maemo.org wiki:
> > http://wiki.maemo.org/Documentation/Maemo_5_Developer_Guide/
> >   * Maemo Info Center
> > http://library.maemodocs.nokia.com/fremantle/index.jsp
> > * Tutorials
> >   * maemo.org wiki tutorials
> >   * Maemo Info Center
> > http://library.maemodocs.nokia.com/fremantle/index.jsp
> > * API docs
> >   * maemo.org website
> > http://maemo.org/development/sdks/maemo_5_api_documentation/
> >   * Maemo Info Center
> > http://library.maemodocs.nokia.com/fremantle/index.jsp (to be
> available
> > in near future)
> > * Example Applications
> >   * maemo.org Garage
> > http://vcs.maemo.org/svn/maemoexamples/tags/maemo_5.0/
> >
> > Bugs reported against Documentation->API docs should be moved to the
> > product they're being reported against with the "docs" keyword as we
> do
> > now - this will make two potential places to record API bugs, but I
> > think this is OK.
> >
> > We should encourage the use of the "URL" field for creation of
> > documentation bugs, since this will allow us to filter the bugs
> > afterwards & make sure they get seen by the right person.
> >
> > Personally, I don't like having 2 API docs subcategories, but since
> old
> > API docs will remain where they are, perhaps it makes sense. What
> makes
> > the most sense for me is to use the URL field as the differentiator,
> > though.
> >
> > Can I have some feedback on this proposal, please? Have people
> avoided
> > reporting documentation bugs for example for lack of a good place to
> > report them? Do you think this will be a net positive change?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dave.
> >
> >
> > --
> > maemo.org docsmaster
> > Email: dneary at maemo.org
> > Jabber: bolsh at jabber.org
> >
> >
> >
More information about the maemo-community mailing list