[maemo-community] email address as bugtracker link for non-small projects?
From: Uwe Kaminski jukey at ju-key.deDate: Wed Aug 25 20:06:44 EEST 2010
- Previous message: email address as bugtracker link for non-small projects?
- Next message: email address as bugtracker link for non-small projects?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 25.08.2010 13:43, schrieb Dave Neary: > Hi, > > Andre Klapper wrote: >> http://wiki.maemo.org/Packaging#Bugtracker_location states >> "It is possible to [...] use [...] an email address." >> No mentioning of size of project. > > This just means that an email address will get past the general > packaging check. > >> http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing/QA_Checklist#Lack_of_bug_reporting_database states "An e-mail address for small projects (wallpapers, for example) can be used". > > And this says that an email address should only be used for small projects. > >> Now which one is correct? (Plus the same topic/info with slight >> differences spread on different pages is not cool.) > > I don't see any inconsistency myself. In the case of mycontacts, the > question comes down to how many bug reports there are - if it's a > couple, then an email address doesn't seem unappropriate. If it's a > couple of dozen, then it probably is. > >> Asking for clarification because of discussion on >> http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_non-free_armel/mycontacts/0.9.13-1/ > > Understood. Thumbs down isn't a nice way to signal that it'd be better > to use a bug tracker. > > IMHO, the use of an email address for bug tracking should not be a > reason to -1 a project, but certainly maintainers should be encouraged > to set up a better bug tracker if they have "rich functionality". I have to disagree. As written a few weeks ago at the testingsquad mailing list: https://garage.maemo.org/pipermail/testingsquad-list/2010-August/000116.html there are good reasons for bugtrackers and _against_ mail adresses: > Beside all technical reasons which make a reporting solution failing... > I never would force developers to do something or not. Even if the > choice of their preferred way to send bugs is something good for > themselves (often) but bad for reporters (email). > > But here we are talking about the _extras_ repository which _is enabled > by default_ on the n900 and it shouldn't be only the decision of the > developer what kind of reporting tool is used. > > If the developer _never_ gives a reaction on bug reports... > > 1. ...by mail reporters will send more and more reports to the address > without getting a feedback what is very frustrating. > > 2. ...by a tracker like the one in garage the reporter has the chance to > see what is already reported and a decision to report or not to report > could be done easily. > > Developing apps costs a lot of time and effort but reporting bugs in a > good way also needs a lot of time. So at least for the apps in extras > there should be a higher level of reporting possibility than mailing. Even yesterday I got an email from a developer who wrote that the bug in his applications is already known but he does not have time to fix it yet. I bet I was the 5. or maybe 10. guy who was mailing him. I'm able to understand that people don't have time but that's why I also would like to see that developers understand that _I_ don't have unlimited time too. As solution for this problem I would love to see a whitelist of projects which allow email adresses: * themes * background pictures * "applications" which only put data into the users directory (e.g. more ringtones...) What do you think? -- Uwe Kaminski http://internettabletblog.de
- Previous message: email address as bugtracker link for non-small projects?
- Next message: email address as bugtracker link for non-small projects?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]