[maemo-community] No subject

[From:]

has no business on the MeeGo side, and fits quite well into maemo.org. It
sounds much similar to the Maemo4 to Maemo5 relationship.

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Ville M. Vainio <vivainio at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Sunny B <sunnyb7532 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 1)  Clarification of the SW Architecture - Is it Meego Core OS with a
> Nokia
> > custom UI or UX on top?  QGil has said MeeGo APIs, but now Dave Neary
> says
> > some legacy Maemo APIs (in addition?).
>
> Harmattan is evolution of maemo5, with no MeeGo Core lineage. It has
> several components that are shared with MeeGo though. That's why it's
> said to be "meego compatible".
>
> > 3)  MeeGo compliance
>
> Harmattan is not MeeGo compliant at all, starting with the fact that
> it's using deb instead of rpm.
>
> > 5)  To what extent will developers of Maemo5 and Maemo 4.1 apps be
> > comfortable with Harmattan and find it a "natural" extension.
>
> Back-end stuff will feel very familiar, GUI development is supposed to
> be done in QML (familiarity of which can be argued, as it's an overall
> new phenomenon).
>
>
> > I agree with Andrew that the thing is a mess.  I think that's beyond the
> > control of maemo.org.  Perhaps we can try to clarify things through
> > discussions with MeeGo people - core Meego OS goes to meego.com and
> > Harmattan UI and UX are with maemo.org or something more strained than
> > that.  But the division is admittedly not good - we'll have to see.  I
> hope
> > we get some clarity at the conference.
>
> As said there is no "Core MeeGo OS" in Harmattan.
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-community mailing list
> maemo-community at maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>

--001636284e2298ea5804a29b22c8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable