[maemo-community] Bug database setting for products in Extras
From: Jeremiah Foster jeremiah at jeremiahfoster.comDate: Mon Jan 4 14:28:12 EET 2010
- Previous message: Bug database setting for products in Extras
- Next message: Bug database setting for products in Extras
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jan 4, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Andrew Flegg wrote: > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:44, Andre Klapper <aklapper at openismus.com> wrote: >> >> currently >> http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing/QA_Checklist#Lack_of_bug_reporting_database >> says: >> "http://bugs.maemo.org/ is the preferred option. Otherwise it needs to >> be identified in the http://maemo.org/packages/ page." >> >> Not that I'm lazy, more that I think it might be overkill. > > Agreed. Is anybody going to take ownership of the changes which have > been proposed for the QA list over the last few months of use? Sprint > meeting tomorrow, hint hint ;-) > >> Hence I'd like to clarify that it's also possible to put an email >> address there if they expect only very few bug reports and think that >> they can handle it via email. > > Entirely agreed. I also think the lack of one altogether should imply > the package page itself; but perhaps we're best off having it be a > conscious choice by the packager. Should maemian be updated with these > fields? That would make sense. :) On a related note, I have been in contact with upstream (lintian) and they see the value of having a more flexible version of their software that can be used by other distros that are debian like. This means that we can potentially get a lot of QA checks for free and turn off those that are irrelevant. I am trying to stay up to date with lintian so hopefully we'll see more integration from lintian into maemian now that upstream is onboard. Jeremiah
- Previous message: Bug database setting for products in Extras
- Next message: Bug database setting for products in Extras
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]