[maemo-community] Sprint task: Refine the karma system
From: Dave Neary dneary at maemo.orgDate: Tue Jan 12 22:53:12 EET 2010
- Previous message: Sprint task: Refine the karma system
- Next message: Sprint task: Refine the karma system
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Valerio, Valerio Valerio wrote: > Here is a proposal based in previous discussion and proposed improvements: > > Karma source: proposed_formula(current_formula) - notes > * Discussion: 2 * sqrt(# posts) - (One point per post) Discussion is mailing lists, I think, right? 2*sqrt(#posts) seems a bit drastic - a mailing list post seems like a bigger contribution than a comment, no? > *TMO 'gold posts'(new, need to be implemented): Posts with +40/+50 > thanks receive additional karma (10 ? 20 ?) Is this consistent with more karma for doers? > * Apps: each new app in Maemo5 extras earn 50p > if (votes > 300) then (300*stars)/6 + 50 > if(stars>=3 && votes =<300) then (votes*stars)/6 + 50 > if(stars <3) then 50 Do you have any stats on how karma might distribute after application? This seems like an awful lot of karma, especially if you're "only" responsible for porting several popular packages to Maemo. It's also a very big jump from 2.xx stars to 3 stars. Shouldn't application related karma be continuous with stars & votes? Why separate <3 stars & >=3 stars? Is the theory that "bad" applications don't deserve so much karma? Cheers, Dave. -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: dneary at maemo.org Jabber: bolsh at jabber.org
- Previous message: Sprint task: Refine the karma system
- Next message: Sprint task: Refine the karma system
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]