[maemo-community] "Community service pack"
From: Attila Csipa maemo at csipa.in.rsDate: Sat Feb 5 23:43:01 EET 2011
- Previous message: "Community service pack"
- Next message: Proposal: code review process for community SSU
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Saturday 05 February 2011 15:13:10 you wrote: > I am still divided on the matter of homescreen loader. It's an > entirely maemo5 dependent package, where a developer explicitly knows > that he wants to use the library (as opposed to just being a fix for > something that's broken). I understand that, but I think that's more of a philosophical debate - I would say that as Maemo5 specific functionality it should have been integrated/be part of the QtMaemo5 module in the first place. If I consider this omission as a bug - as it should track Qt versions which it cannot unless it's pushed through either Qt or mcsp, it's clear why I see it as a hotfix :) As said - it's a question of viewpoint so I don't expect everyone to agree and that's why I didn't include it in the first wave (was just looking for pros/cons). Best regards, Attila Csipa
- Previous message: "Community service pack"
- Next message: Proposal: code review process for community SSU
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]