[maemo-community] Council nomination.

From: Ville M. Vainio vivainio at gmail.com
Date: Tue Apr 3 20:55:46 EEST 2012
One concrete outcome of these discussions could be a consolidated list of
things community wants out of Nokia in order to be able to work effectively
(e.g. on stuff like cssu)
On Apr 3, 2012 3:14 PM, "Iván Gálvez Junquera" <ivgalvez at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I think I have already provided my vision on most of the subjects in
> different TMO threads, but clarify I'll try to summarise some points:
> I would agree that a merge between communities (and not only those tied to
> Nokia but any others related to open mobile devices in general) could be
> beneficial and I would try to encourage it, specially to share resources
> and servers.
> But honestly, considering the extremely difficulties we have seen to push
> things such as CSSU, KP, maintenance of orphaned packages and improvement
> on testing process I wonder if that would be more problematic than
> beneficial in the long run. The Maemo community needs more administrative
> privileges for its trusted members to actually do things, instead of depend
> on Nokia, Nemein or whatever contractor could do the job in the future. And
> that would be my first priority.
> I agree in that the communication between Nokia and the Community Council
> and members have been extremely difficult, but I only see one of the parts
> ignoring the other. You can argue that communication always involve two
> parts and it's true that there is always steps that can be done, but I have
> experienced myself the lack of response and is very difficult to
> communicate only in one direction. I hope this situation could be improved
> soon, now that Quim is again to have responsibilities on that matter.
> However I haven't seen any communication problem between the Council and
> the community. The only problem here is that the only visible and active
> member has been SD69 (Rob) which is obviously not enough. I hope that more
> people could be active during next term to improve that visibility.
> Regards
> 2012/4/3 Andrew Flegg <andrew at bleb.org>
>> On 3 April 2012 11:57, Iván Gálvez Junquera <ivgalvez at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I volunteer to the Concil for this next year. I'm pretty sure I won't
>> have
>> > too much spare time but I can promise I won't leave without notice or
>> move
>> > to any other platform  in the years to come.
>> Could you expand on your vision for the community?
>> What are your thoughts on integrating Harmattan and potentially even
>> Meltemi into the Maemo community and maemo.org?
>> As you're aware, there's a discussion on TMO[1] which touches upon
>> many of the things which will be important in this election. Do you
>> agree there's been a breakdown in communication between Nokia, Nemein
>> and the council; and the council and the community? If so, how do we
>> fix it?
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Andrew
>> [1] http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=1187362#post1187362
>> --
>> Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org  |  http://www.bleb.org/
>> _______________________________________________
>> maemo-community mailing list
>> maemo-community at maemo.org
>> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
> --
> Iván Gálvez Junquera
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-community mailing list
> maemo-community at maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-community/attachments/20120403/5e81c1b6/attachment.htm>
More information about the maemo-community mailing list