[maemo-community] Council nomination.
From: Ville M. Vainio vivainio at gmail.comDate: Tue Apr 3 20:55:46 EEST 2012
- Previous message: Council nomination.
- Next message: I nominate myself (jcharpak) for council member
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
One concrete outcome of these discussions could be a consolidated list of things community wants out of Nokia in order to be able to work effectively (e.g. on stuff like cssu) On Apr 3, 2012 3:14 PM, "Iván Gálvez Junquera" <ivgalvez at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I think I have already provided my vision on most of the subjects in > different TMO threads, but clarify I'll try to summarise some points: > > I would agree that a merge between communities (and not only those tied to > Nokia but any others related to open mobile devices in general) could be > beneficial and I would try to encourage it, specially to share resources > and servers. > > But honestly, considering the extremely difficulties we have seen to push > things such as CSSU, KP, maintenance of orphaned packages and improvement > on testing process I wonder if that would be more problematic than > beneficial in the long run. The Maemo community needs more administrative > privileges for its trusted members to actually do things, instead of depend > on Nokia, Nemein or whatever contractor could do the job in the future. And > that would be my first priority. > > I agree in that the communication between Nokia and the Community Council > and members have been extremely difficult, but I only see one of the parts > ignoring the other. You can argue that communication always involve two > parts and it's true that there is always steps that can be done, but I have > experienced myself the lack of response and is very difficult to > communicate only in one direction. I hope this situation could be improved > soon, now that Quim is again to have responsibilities on that matter. > > However I haven't seen any communication problem between the Council and > the community. The only problem here is that the only visible and active > member has been SD69 (Rob) which is obviously not enough. I hope that more > people could be active during next term to improve that visibility. > > Regards > > 2012/4/3 Andrew Flegg <andrew at bleb.org> > >> On 3 April 2012 11:57, Iván Gálvez Junquera <ivgalvez at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > I volunteer to the Concil for this next year. I'm pretty sure I won't >> have >> > too much spare time but I can promise I won't leave without notice or >> move >> > to any other platform in the years to come. >> >> Could you expand on your vision for the community? >> >> What are your thoughts on integrating Harmattan and potentially even >> Meltemi into the Maemo community and maemo.org? >> >> As you're aware, there's a discussion on TMO[1] which touches upon >> many of the things which will be important in this election. Do you >> agree there's been a breakdown in communication between Nokia, Nemein >> and the council; and the council and the community? If so, how do we >> fix it? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Andrew >> >> [1] http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=1187362#post1187362 >> >> -- >> Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ >> _______________________________________________ >> maemo-community mailing list >> maemo-community at maemo.org >> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community >> > > > > -- > Iván Gálvez Junquera > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-community mailing list > maemo-community at maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-community/attachments/20120403/5e81c1b6/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: Council nomination.
- Next message: I nominate myself (jcharpak) for council member
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]