[maemo-community] Council Meeting
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Sun Apr 15 21:36:43 EEST 2012
- Previous message: Council Meeting
- Next message: Council Meeting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 15 April 2012 19:26, Graham Cobb <g+770 at cobb.uk.net> wrote: > On Sunday 15 April 2012 17:53:15 quim.gil at nokia.com wrote: > >> A legal entity can only make a formal agreement with another legal entity. >> That was/is the case of the KDE Free Qt Foundation, which seems to be a >> source of inspiration of this proposal - >> http://www.kde.org/community/whatiskde/kdefreeqtfoundation.php > > IANAL but I don't agree. Me neither, and thank you Graham for posting what I was going to (but better put, as ever ;-)) > An agreement with a legal entity *might* be the right answer, but Nokia > could also just publish a licence available to anyone who follows certain > rules (e.g. no derived works, proper acreditation, non-commercial, or whatever > rules Nokia wants -- not necessarily a CC licence but along similar lines). Or even more restrictive such as (OTTOMH), "for the building of software for, and use with, Nokia devices originally shipped with Maemo". >> "maemo.org" is just an Internet domain (owned by Nokia). The Maemo >> community is not a legal entity. > > But a legal entity could be set up if necessary. Personally, I prefer the > "licence anyone, under certain conditions" approach (not least because it > could be perpetual, instead of requiring the entity to continue to exist). Indeed. I'm eager to see the non-legal entity routes exhausted first as, as you say, there's a continued existence aspect (and, the corollary, that the entity is pursuing the agenda it was originally established with) but also that I think it could be a step change in the amount of work. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/
- Previous message: Council Meeting
- Next message: Council Meeting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]