[maemo-community] Community OBS
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Sun Apr 15 21:42:05 EEST 2012
- Previous message: Community OBS
- Next message: Community OBS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12 April 2012 14:17, robert bauer <nybauer at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks vgrade. Jaffa, please record the follow on discussion you had with > X-Fade after #mer-meeting in this thread. The gist was: * Replacing Extras Autobuilder with OBS and a Mer project managed OBS are independent. * Nokia pay Nemein for x hours of maemo.org support a month. Anything above and beyond business-as-usual should deliver tangible, and documented, benefits to maemo.org with transparent investment & progress. * Some packages currently built by the autobuilder don't build cleanly in COBS. An approach (including, potentially, binary & source imports directly) would need to be determined for these. * The premise that aligning maemo.org builder + Downloads + Packages + QA with other projects, such as AFM will mean less inconsistency and more efficiency in terms of maintenance/development is _probably_ true; but may need to be spelt out and proven. Cheers, Andrew The transcript: 18:05 < Jaffa> Belated question/point - the question of maemo.org using a Mer project managed OBS is independent of replacing Extras Autobuilder with OBS. 18:06 < X-Fade> First we need to see if it is technically feasilble. 18:06 < Jaffa> Sure, the same people would be involved; but maemo.org is paying for x FTE from Nemein, including X-Fade. Gets a bit blurry if Nokia is paying of the servers for both, but it sounds like server donations is something Mer doesn't want anyway, 18:07 < Jaffa> X-Fade: In the status update, you said it had been working as a proof-of-concept. 18:07 < Stskeeps> also.. that not all packages may build under 'obs' autobuilder 18:07 < Stskeeps> we can take this discussion in #mer as well 18:08 < Jaffa> Stskeeps: That's only a problem when rebuilding them; which will probably only happen if there's a maintainer around 18:09 < X-Fade> Well, yes and no. 18:09 < X-Fade> You'd ultimately want to manage the whole repository in OBS. 18:10 < X-Fade> But that _is_ a lot of work :) 18:10 < Jaffa> Right, but the "Extras" and "Extras-testing" repos would be a single thing, and could be seeded by the existing repos (binaries + source) 18:10 < X-Fade> Only until someone uploads a lib which those libraries depend on. 18:11 < Jaffa> X-Fade: I suppose the premise (which hasn't been spelt out, nor confirmed) is that aligning maemo.org builder + Downloads + Packages + QA with other projects, such as AFM will mean less inconsistency and more efficiency in terms of maintenance/development. 18:11 < X-Fade> You'd want to make that possible at some point. 18:11 < Jaffa> True. 18:11 < X-Fade> A better maintained repo. 18:12 < X-Fade> Now we can not do things like that. 18:12 < Jaffa> Once the scope of the problem is known, a "taskforce" could try and tackle them (depending on the types of problems, and how many there are) 18:12 < X-Fade> We could even update the fremantle sdk :D 18:12 < X-Fade> But yes, might be a topic for another meeting/thread. 18:13 < Jaffa> X-Fade: TBH, a bit too much time gets spent designing/implementing the perfect generic solution. It's a current restriction, there's no guarantee an arbitrary package in Extras will rebuild with its dependencies at the moment (IIRC) -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/
- Previous message: Community OBS
- Next message: Community OBS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]