[maemo-community] Council Meeting
From: robert bauer nybauer at gmail.comDate: Wed Apr 18 20:30:42 EEST 2012
- Previous message: Council Meeting
- Next message: Council Meeting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Quim Gil <quim.gil at nokia.com> wrote: > On 04/17/2012 01:31 PM, Quim Gil wrote: > >> I sent a first question to the Nokia legal team and I got a first >> answer. They need to know the exact list of packages, with a special >> attention of any proprietary binary coming from third parties. >> > > Forgot to say that I asked already Soumya Bijjal and Niels about those > lists. > > A starting point: > > Harmattan: > http://harmattan-dev.nokia.**com/stable/harmattan/beta3_vs_** > final_content_comparison.html<http://harmattan-dev.nokia.com/stable/harmattan/beta3_vs_final_content_comparison.html> > > Fremantle: > http://repository.maemo.org/**stable/fremantle/maemo5.0_** > update6_vs_maemo5.0_update7_**content_comparison.html<http://repository.maemo.org/stable/fremantle/maemo5.0_update6_vs_maemo5.0_update7_content_comparison.html> > > Diablo: > http://repository.maemo.org/**stable/diablo/4.1.1_vs_4.1.2_** > content_comparison.html<http://repository.maemo.org/stable/diablo/4.1.1_vs_4.1.2_content_comparison.html> > > Chinook: > http://repository.maemo.org/**stable/chinook/4.0_vs_4.0.1_** > content_comparison.html<http://repository.maemo.org/stable/chinook/4.0_vs_4.0.1_content_comparison.html> > > I have asked them whether all those packages are REQUIRED for an OBS > target. > > The open source package are irrelevant since they can be "re-hosted" and > redistributed already now. > > Then we have the proprietary packages. All they appear as 'Nokia binaries' > but in fact some of those my have a non-Nokia copyright. This is what > Soumya will need to parse i order to find the 3rd party proprietary > binaries. > > From a legal point of view Nokia and non-Nokia binaries are two totally > different categories since Nokia cannot grant any permissions for the > latter on its own. > > If there are 3rd party binaries that are required to build OBS targets > then I will go back to my point of how worth it is to change the current > situation given that there is no actual risk anybody could point to on > Nokia pulling hosting & funds for the servers where that software is > currently hosted. As explained in the IRC meeting, changing the terms for > the Nokia binaries without a strong business reason is already complex. I > expect convincing legal teams in other companies under the same arguments > to be even more complicated. > > > Thanks for the lists. Sure, if it turns out there are 3rd party binaries needed for an OBS target, then let's pause the process and discuss the situation. Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-community/attachments/20120418/70aedab2/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: Council Meeting
- Next message: Council Meeting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]