[maemo-community] N9 device seeding activity
From: robert bauer nybauer at gmail.comDate: Fri Apr 27 05:20:36 EEST 2012
- Previous message: N9 device seeding activity
- Next message: N9 device seeding activity
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Timo Härkönen <timop.harkonen at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi > > 26. huhtikuuta 2012 16.53 Iván Gálvez Junquera <ivgalvez at gmail.com>kirjoitti: > > I completely agree about coordinating with Council and the number of >> devices as proposed by Rob and Cosimo. >> > > I agree on the device amount for the competition but didn't see anyone > proposing an amount for the seeding itself. So I'm proposing 80 to get that > discussion going. That would make the total number of devices 100. I think > the seeding should be done like proposed earlier by providing a wiki page > where people willing to get one need to add their details including past, > current and planned contributions to the community. So pretty similar thing > that Quim & co. used with the meego developer device program. And then the > council decides who gets a device. > > In any case I'd like to see the requirements for getting a device clearly > documented (after there's a consensus for them) to the same wiki page. So > I'd ask for Maemo.org user name with link to the profile, description of > contributions with links to those and summary of future plans. So my main > requirerement would be contributions that benefit the community. There's a > lot of stuff that be contributed to the community and they should all have > some weight. Contributions can be applications, other development, QA, > helping people, communications (think about what people behind the weekly > news are doing) or something else. > Basically agreed. I'd like to see future plans given minimal weight - it's hard to gauge promises, etc, and IMO these should be viewed as unexpected rewards/thank yous for those who have served the community. I think the time period should be the last year or two so someone who left the community can't claim a device based on service they did three years ago. If we could do it (and I know it's not feasible), I'd use karma over the last 1-2 years as a rough starting point (maybe drop tmo posts, but not tmo thanks) And by community contributions, we should clarify we mean the maemo.org community (no disrespect to Mer/nemo/qt/meego/etc). And I think we should allow nomination of others instead of just self-nominations, and community members to give +1s to the nominations of others on the wiki page. (mindful to determine that people can't receive a second device if they already have one) > > This might sound like self evident but when it comes to free gadgets the > rules need to be very clear and the instance who has the final say clearly > definded (the council). And I also agree that in no situation should one > single person be able to make the call on who gets a device or not. > Therefore I'd wait until the new council has been elected (no disrepect to > Rob intended). > I agree we should let new council (or a committee they select) decide who gets a device, but not wait on determining the criteria to be applied so we can meet the deadline qgil has requested. Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-community/attachments/20120426/dc27ffbc/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: N9 device seeding activity
- Next message: N9 device seeding activity
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]