[maemo-community] Foundation's Board - crisis

[From: Aniello Del Sorbo]

I haven't read the whole topic on the issue, but I vouch for Randall
as I know him in person.
Whatever he has done, I am sure he had his very good reason.

For what his worth, also, I don't like Estel way of commenting. Never
liked it before, continue to do so.

So Thanks Estel for doing a great job in making this community a very
welcoming one.

anidel


On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Randall Arnold <texrat at ovi.com> wrote:
> Relax, Estel.  I've already explained myself and apologized to the
> community.  Granted I should have done some relaxing myself before posting.
> But why you feel the need to prolong this on the mailing list I have no
> idea-- especially after you sang a different tune in the forum.
>
> What I would REALLY like to see now, though, is for everyone who's been
> giving me crap to take a look at their own behavior.  The continued arguing
> is what got me aggravated in the first place.
>
> Randy
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "twilight312 at gmail.com" <twilight312 at gmail.com>
> To: List for community development <maemo-community at maemo.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 3:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Foundation's Board - crisis
>
> Unfortunately, none of propositions for handling such situation got
> incorporated into bylaws, and only proposition that Council have, is
> stretching the rules.
>
> I think, that it's clearly unfair to do so, in case of *negative* Randall's
> example - when, just a while ago, we disagreed to bend rules for *positive*
> case of Mentalist Traceur willing to candidate for Board (he was late few
> hours with his candidacy).
>
> If we (as per we = Community) declined his right to candidate, due to will
> for following rules strictly, we should so now. And that, sadly, via actual
> version of bylaws, mean another period of submitting candidates, and
> election.
>
> Thanks Texrat, for withdrawing your candidacy just few hours, after 86
> people voted for you, and voting got closed. It helped estabilishing
> foundation a *much*, really...
>
> /Estel
>
> On sob 20 paź 2012 19:39:19 CEST, misterc <claudebucher at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> think there was a fairly extended debate during "foundation by-laws"
>> about how such situation should be addressed. can't seem to find it now,
>> but i think the Council can nominate one of the follow up runners
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>>
>> http://maemo-community-mailing-lists.2589537.n2.nabble.com/Foundation-s-Board-crisis-tp7580532p7580533.html
>> Sent from the maemo-community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing
>> list maemo-community at maemo.org
>> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-community mailing list
> maemo-community at maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-community mailing list
> maemo-community at maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>