[maemo-community] [HFB] Some thoughts concerning "rules of engagement" that fall outside of the Bylaws document...
From: Lucas Maneos maemo at subs.maneos.orgDate: Tue Oct 23 11:52:55 EEST 2012
- Previous message: [HFB] Some thoughts concerning "rules of engagement" that fall outside of the Bylaws document...
- Next message: [HFB] Some thoughts concerning "rules of engagement" that fall outside of the Bylaws document...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:32:33PM -0400, robert bauer wrote: > I can't explain why these non-profits have done what they have done. How > do we know they have not made a mistake? We (well, I) don't. But if they are wrong, and the law forbids any non-voice conferencing, it seems quite discriminatory to me (for instance it means no one with a speech or hearing disability can serve on the board) and I'm surprised it hasn't been challenged. In light of this, are we sure we want the foundation incorporated in Pennsylvania? Clearly we want to be able to have IRC meetings (it's even written in the bylaws), is there some benefit in being in PA that trumps this? L.
- Previous message: [HFB] Some thoughts concerning "rules of engagement" that fall outside of the Bylaws document...
- Next message: [HFB] Some thoughts concerning "rules of engagement" that fall outside of the Bylaws document...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]