I found this Fedora page when looking for FOSDEM 2010 info.  They use mediawiki too-- but look at the design of this thing:<br />
<br />
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FOSDEM_2010">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FOSDEM_2010</a><br />
<br />
I want THAT look (or similar) for maemo.org.<br />
<br />
Thoughts?<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana"><span><strong>Randall (Randy) Arnold</strong><br />
<span style="color: #ff6600">maemo.org community council</span><br />
</span></span><a href="http://tabulacrypticum.wordpress.com/"><span style="font-family: Verdana">http://tabulacrypticum.wordpress.com/</span></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
> ----- Original message ----- <br />
> From: "Thomas Waelti" <twaelti@gmail.com><br />
> To: "List for community development" <maemo-community@maemo.org>, "Dave Neary" <dneary@maemo.org><br />
> Subject: Re: Wiki Action Group: first task<br />
> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:33:14 +0200<br />
> <br />
> <br />
> >> Just one thing first: some of the orphaned pages aren't really orphaned,<br />
> >> but "just" got linked the wrong way, by using an external instead of an<br />
> >> internal link. Remember this when cleaning up.<br />
> ><br />
> > Good point! Do you have any hints on finding these?<br />
> <br />
> Either I succeeded in cleaning all of the pages or our search engines <br />
> are not good enough... :-(<br />
> Neither searching the wiki for "[http://wiki.maemo" nor googling <br />
> ""[http://wiki.maemo.org/" -retrieved site:wiki.maemo.org" was any <br />
> help.<br />
> <br />
> >> Clean up the intro of http://wiki.maemo.org/Maemowiki_Action_Group<br />
> >> somewhat. Can the docmaster do that?<br />
> ><br />
> > Sure - anyone can do that. What's unclear to you?<br />
> <br />
> Current misssion focus. Especially the midgard transition and <br />
> readying the templates - isn't that mostly done?<br />
> <br />
> >> Could we just use a category "Trash" to mark pages for deletion?<br />
> > Yes, adding a Trash category for pages marked for deletion is a good<br />
> > idea - go for it!<br />
> <br />
> Will do.<br />
> <br />
> >> Let's add OS-related categories such as OS2008/Maemo5/Mer. Otherwise we<br />
> >> will end up with a large mishmash of stuff.<br />
> ><br />
> > Does that approach scale? I've thought about this before - is there<br />
> > really a need for "OS2008/USB networking" and "OS2009/USB networking"? I<br />
> > can certainly understand subsections for pages which are specific to a<br />
> > distribution but for general tutorials or hints & tips, I don't think<br />
> > they're necessary. Of course, the problem is that the lines blur - stuff<br />
> > that was hard under OS2007 got easier in OS2008 and needs new<br />
> > instructions - but that's the general principle.<br />
> <br />
> Yes it should scale - my idea is to apply these OS categories rather <br />
> like labels, not doing content-related subcategories under them. So <br />
> you have an article in the networking category, valid for OS2008. Or <br />
> one on packaging (category development), valid for OS2008 and Maemo5. <br />
> This would make it easier than to add OS-specific subsections in each <br />
> article if there isn't anything to say. OTOH, we should put <br />
> networking as a subcategory under connectivity.<br />
> I'll try to order and subcategorize our categories, building a category tree.<br />
> <br />
> >> The results of this discussion should go to either the "Maemo Wiki<br />
> >> Principles" subsection the the action group OR<br />
> >> http://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Documentation_rules (which one? I'd prefer<br />
> >> the latter)<br />
> ><br />
> > I'd prefer to start moving away from the "Task:" nomenclature - I don't<br />
> > think it adds much, and it makes page names a bit more awkward.<br />
> ><br />
> > How about "Editing guidelines" or "Documentation guidelines"?<br />
> <br />
> Let's keep it in our subsection for the moment, we can still create a <br />
> new page later if necessary (too many stubs out there already :-)<br />
> <br />
> >> Which brings up another needed cleanup: Instead of being part of the<br />
> >> category "Tasks", some pages only have the prefix "Task:". I suggest<br />
> >> that all tasks be categorized as such and that we refrain from using the<br />
> >> Task: prefix.<br />
> ><br />
> > Oh good - we're in agreement on this :)<br />
> <br />
> Do we clean that up then? Would mean to move all "Task:" pages to the <br />
> same pagename without the "Task:" prefix, and categorizing as Task if <br />
> not yet done.<br />
> <br />
> Workworkwork...<br />
> -Tom<br />
> <br />
> _______________________________________________<br />
> maemo-community mailing list<br />
> maemo-community@maemo.org<br />
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community<br />
><BR>
<br><br>
--------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Ovi Mail: Making email access easy<br>
<a href='http://mail.ovi.com'>http://mail.ovi.com</a><br>