I second that (i.e. not necessarily a real-time debate, but public discussion).<div><br></div><div><br clear="all">Best regards / Med venlig hilsen / Z poważaniem,<br><br>Arek Stopczynski<br><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 17 March 2010 06:34, Ryan Abel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rabelg5@gmail.com">rabelg5@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Mar 17, 2010, at 12:54 AM, Sanjeev (EIPI) wrote:<br>
<br>
> Candidates - would you be kind enough to respond to this email by<br>
> tomorrow with your willingness to participate in this 'debate'<br>
> process?<br>
<br>
</div>I don't believe a true debate format is appropriate for the sort of election we're holding, but, yes, I'm more than willing to participate in some sort of QA/discussion/whatever. ;)<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
maemo-community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:maemo-community@maemo.org">maemo-community@maemo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community" target="_blank">https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>