<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Andrew Flegg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andrew@bleb.org">andrew@bleb.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">I am strongly against this, for the reasons outlined above. We<br></div>
shouldn't be putting up *unnecessary* barriers to someone getting<br>
their application into Extras, and this *is* one of those, IMHO.<br>
</blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>I already wrote about the topic on the testing list, stating my ambivalent feelings</div><div>about the topic. After some pondering, though, I must say I don't see *ANY*</div><div>
point in having an email address in the bugtracker field. Whatsoever. If we</div><div>say email is good enough, we already have a maintainer field which is an</div><div>email address, the bugtracker is IN ADDITION to this. So as far as I'm</div>
<div>concerned, emails in bugtracker fields should die. Thus for me the question is</div><div>whether we should require a proper web-based bugtracker or not. If not, that</div><div>field should be optional. If yes, then everybody should have it. </div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div>