<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Sivan Greenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sivan@omniqueue.com">sivan@omniqueue.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hey,<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Dave Neary <<a href="mailto:dneary@maemo.org">dneary@maemo.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> Sivan Greenberg wrote:<br>
>> Does this mean that Harmattan is all open source apart for the closed<br>
>> UI ? If this is the only closed source part, then I don't see a<br>
>> problem in assimilating it in <a href="http://maemo.org" target="_blank">maemo.org</a>.<br>
><br>
> You say that as if that were our decision to make.<br>
<br>
</div>Ofcourse not, I'm just worried about the signal/noise ratio burdened<br>
on the Maemo infrastructure (especially TMO) once newer closed parts<br>
or new closed versions of previously open parts will be introduced. I<br>
was merely asking :)<br>
<br>
<br>
I apologize if this is how it sounded.<br>
<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>I don't know what you mean by "assimilating" but there will be a problem if the Harmattan UI is closed. I don't mean to say that Harmattan won't be discussed in t.m.o. albeit with low S/N ratio.<br>
<br> <br>