<br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Andrew Flegg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andrew@bleb.org">andrew@bleb.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT:#ccc 1px solid;MARGIN:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;PADDING-LEFT:1ex" class="gmail_quote">
<div class="im">On 3 April 2012 13:46, robert bauer <<a href="mailto:nybauer@gmail.com">nybauer@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Thanks for pointing that out. I don't see any way forward except to extend<br>> for a month.<br>
><br>> I will invite referendum to amend the council rules...<br><br></div>Why do you consider a month bad? We've seen this kick off a discussion<br>about the difficulties the current council have faced; how things<br>
could be improved and a discussion about the future of the community.<br><br>I don't expect fully thought through positions to emerge, unbidden,<br>from the candidates. I hope a month of open, transparent discussion<br>
(about all the plans which they've considered/read/propose) would<br>produce a much stronger idea of the candidates' ideas.<br></blockquote>
<div>In these circumstances, it is another month we have two out of three council members who are not active. Having the discussion is obviously good. But I wouldn't be surprised if it dies down after a week or two and we have a period of time just waiting for the vote. </div>
</div>