<div class="gmail_extra">Hi<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">27. huhtikuuta 2012 13.37 Iván Gálvez Junquera <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ivgalvez@gmail.com" target="_blank">ivgalvez@gmail.com</a>></span> kirjoitti:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_extra">The other issue is about those packages that have fulfilled the criteria but, probably due to the long time waiting in the queue, now they are pending to be pushed by the maintainers</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I'm yet pending to prepare a list of "to be promoted packages". My intention is to gather all the information about status, maintainers and TMO related threads, and try to contact the developers to promote their packages. After that, all non promoted packages could be pushed by the a temporary new maintainer designed by the Council if they don't present any problem.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">But I have had a very busy week, hopefully I could do something more next week.</div></blockquote><div><br>I'm planning a similar effort but currently very busy implementing the devaamo summit hacking challenge and such things. Anyway once you have the list ready I can also go through it based on your findings.<br>
<br>-Timo<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Regards.<br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2012/4/27 robert bauer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nybauer@gmail.com" target="_blank">nybauer@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div class="h5">
<div class="gmail_extra"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Timo Härkönen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:timop.harkonen@gmail.com" target="_blank">timop.harkonen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_extra">Hi<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">27. huhtikuuta 2012 12.12 Neal H. Walfield <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:neal@walfield.org" target="_blank">neal@walfield.org</a>></span> kirjoitti:<div>
<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
At Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:06:59 -0400,<br>
robert bauer wrote:<br>
> I became aware that packages were stuck and addressed the qa/promotion<br>
> process a couple months ago -<br>
<br>
Can you please summarize how you addressed this? I started this<br>
discussion by suggesting that we lower the karma threshold at which a<br>
package is promoted, but whatever you've done hasn't effect (at least)<br>
one of my packages, which has three thumbs up, two from "testers:"<br>
<br></blockquote></div><div><br>I wouldn't say the problem is fixed. There's been some proposals on how
to resolve it but afaik not action yet. Although the tresholds for
requires votes were lowered to iirc 3 votes from testers or 6 otherwise.
The main problem still is not enough people doing testing. The discussion needs to be resuccerted. I would keep the discussion here and not have in the testing squad list since this is not only a tester thing.<br> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<a href="http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4%7E20111203/" target="_blank">http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~20111203/</a><br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>A bit hard package to test. It isn't very clear how to actually use it. so I'd guess that's why it hasn't been tested by that many. Anyway, I tried it and seems there's a missing dependency in the package since apt-woodchuck command raises a missing import exception (gconf) so I just voted it down.<br>
<br></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div>The threshold was lowered so that a single thumbs up from a supertester and no thumbs down is enough to promote a package. Here is my email on that:<br><br><a href="https://garage.maemo.org/pipermail/testingsquad-list/2012-March/000169.html" target="_blank">https://garage.maemo.org/pipermail/testingsquad-list/2012-March/000169.html</a><br>
<br>From Timo's comment, there is some confusion which I hope this now helps with. There is of course the problem that there is a long list of packages so it will take time. I expect another problem is that the new threshold may have to be retroactively applied in the case of this package.<br>
<br>In any event, once Timo's issue is addressed, he can change his vote and the package should be promoted.<br><br>Rob <br></div>
<br></div></div><div class="im">_______________________________________________<br>
maemo-community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:maemo-community@maemo.org" target="_blank">maemo-community@maemo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community" target="_blank">https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Iván Gálvez Junquera<br>
</font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
maemo-community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:maemo-community@maemo.org">maemo-community@maemo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community" target="_blank">https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>