It is not a hinder. There are many reasons fir having a second device. First, some development brings a risk of frying (brick) a device. One more reason is that there are differences between N9/950 allbeit they are similar in many ways. It definately helps development quality and speed.<div>
Lastly, surely many will already own one or more devices, having already contributed to this community.<span></span></div><div><br></div><div>/nieldk<br><br>On Monday, June 4, 2012, zimon wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
For someone who already has N9 or/and N950, why do you want another
one?<br>
<br>
I'd think it serves not as much purpose to give N9/N950 to those
people, no matter how useful they are for the community.<br>
<br>
On 06/03/2012 09:43 PM, SLR wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>Is this still running, and is this the right place?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span></span><span></span>Application
if not all devices are allocated. N9 preferred, as I have an N950
thanks to the graciousness of somebody.
<div> <br>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div>