<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="generator" content="Osso Notes">
<title></title></head>
<body>
<p>Thanks for clarification. As regular Maemo user, I had impression, that there was consensus, about Council will to ask for Community approval of proposed, final version of bylaws (via referendum).
<br>
<br>I acknowledged, that it's going to be otherwise.
<br>
<br>/Estel
<br>
<br>On śro 10 paź 2012 19:09:27 CEST, Craig Woodward <<a href="mailto:woody@rochester.rr.com">woody@rochester.rr.com</a>> wrote:
<br>
<br>>
<br>> > As for a decision on the process going forward with the Board, that's
<br>> > still in debate at the moment internally.
<br>>
<br>> The elections *were* to run at the same time.  In no event can the Board
<br>> be delayed by a month, at that would very likely render it unable to do
<br>> the tasks required in the remaining time.  The fact that things are
<br>> currently in a pending state is in fact distressing to me (and others).
<br>>
<br>> There has never been a decision to have a referendum on the bylaws,
<br>> despite you continually stating otherwise.  The bylaws will be (and must
<br>> be for legal reasons) approved by the members of the first Board.  The
<br>> bylaws have been in review both here and in the forums for some time,
<br>> with ample chances to supply input.  There have, in fact, been 6
<br>> revisions done with community input, and at least a 7th revision still
<br>> needs to be done to incorporate a few minor changes relating to election
<br>> rules to clarify issues like the ones we just had.
<br>>
<br>> Many thanks to those who have commented and continue to improve on them.
<br>>
<br>> -Craig
<br>>
<br>> ---- "<a href="mailto:twilight312@gmail.com">twilight312@gmail.com</a>" <<a href="mailto:twilight312@gmail.com">twilight312@gmail.com</a>> wrote:
<br>>
<br>> =============
<br>> Is there a decision about extending Board election, too? Wasn't it mean
<br>> to run election for both bodies + referendum about bylaws, at the same
<br>> time?
<br>>
<br>> /Estel
<br>>
<br>> On wto 09 paź 2012 21:27:17 CEST, Craig Woodward
<br>> <<a href="mailto:woody@rochester.rr.com">woody@rochester.rr.com</a>> wrote:
<br>>
<br>> > As per a clarification of miscommunication within the Council, I am
<br>> > happy to announce the following:
<br>> >
<br>> > As Council Chair, I'm declaring Council nominations to be retroactively
<br>> > re-opened until October 28th, and voting will occur for Council from
<br>> > November 2nd through the 8th. I encourage others to consider their own
<br>> > nomination for Council as well.
<br>> >
<br>> > As for a decision on the process going forward with the Board, that's
<br>> > still in debate at the moment internally. To date no election has been
<br>> > started. I am hopeful that will be clarified soon. Regardless, when
<br>> > there is movement on this topic I will make that information available
<br>> > here as soon as I possibly can.
<br>> >
<br>> >
<br>> > _______________________________________________
<br>> > maemo-community mailing list
<br>> > <a href="mailto:maemo-community@maemo.org">maemo-community@maemo.org</a>
<br>> > <a href="https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community">https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community</a>
<br>>
<br>>
<br>> _______________________________________________
<br>> maemo-community mailing list
<br>> <a href="mailto:maemo-community@maemo.org">maemo-community@maemo.org</a>
<br>> <a href="https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community">https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community</a>
<br><br></p>
</body>
</html>