[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Gtk vs. Qt
From: Nils Faerber nils.faerber at kernelconcepts.deDate: Tue Jul 26 21:30:39 EEST 2005
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Gtk vs. Qt
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Gtk vs. Qt
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lorn Potter schrieb: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:15 pm, Kate Alhola wrote: >>I just checked size of native arm libqt-mt.so.3.3.4 and it was 10917826 >>bytes ( 10Mbyte !! ) > This is why Qtopia uses Qt/E 2 (which is still actively maintained). You can > use that or wait for Qt/E4. You can whittle down the size by configuring only > useful features. What I still do not understand, please excuse my ignorance, will this Qt/e version still need the whole framebuffer or will it run in some kind of simulated framebuffer inside X11? And what would be the consequences of that, i.e. will it be possibleto run multiple of such Qt/e apps simultanously? This is really not continueing the fl*me, I am really curious what the state of Qt/e is nowadays and which possibilities there are to enable compatibility... Cheers nils faerber - -- kernel concepts Tel: +49-271-771091-12 Dreisbachstr. 24 Fax: +49-271-771091-19 D-57250 Netphen Mob: +49-176-21024535 - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC5oFPJXeIURG1qHgRArbrAKDjT1/cm/1XqIyrBpyT6kmCuppnzwCeJBuj m8/Xe3KXe/SqbLnFThP2Nm4= =JD+u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Gtk vs. Qt
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Gtk vs. Qt
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]