[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Gtk vs. Qt
From: Kate Alhola kate.alhola at nokia.comDate: Wed Jul 27 10:27:31 EEST 2005
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Gtk vs. Qt
- Next message: [maemo-developers] GPE teleport in maemo
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ext Lorn Potter wrote: >Qt/e will still need a framebuffer. whether is is a virtual framebuffer or >not, it does not matter. >At least with qvfb (qvfb is similar to xvfb), one can run many instances. So >every running qt/e application can have its own virtual framebuffer. You must >export QWS_DISPLAY=QVFb:0 or QVFb:1. Or use just one vfb, and run many >applications in that. > Just for this reason, least in my opinion, using Qt/e is out of the question. I think that it will be wery dificult even to try to make Qt application intrgration to Maemo desktop if everyone of them is running in own virtual framebuffer and even more if they are running completelly own Qtopia desktop inside of virtual framebuffer window... Still i think that target should be that Qt applications need to be possible integrate as closelly as possible to Maemo so that ordinary users see onlyvery minor diferencies in look and feel just like in Linux desktop. So, Qt/X11 and with Maemo input methods, themes and Maemo desktop interface adaptations will be best choice. Kate
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Gtk vs. Qt
- Next message: [maemo-developers] GPE teleport in maemo
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]