[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Xvnc vs Xnest (with screenshot :))
From: Koen Kooi koen at handhelds.orgDate: Mon Jun 6 21:49:47 EEST 2005
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Xvnc vs Xnest (with screenshot :))
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Xvnc vs Xnest (with screenshot :))
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brad Clements wrote: > On 6 Jun 2005 at 16:53, Ed Bartosh wrote: > > >>I don't think so. We already have Opera there. There is just no space for both of them :) >>I'm just playing with maemo developer platform as any of you guys. > > > > Too bad minimo isn't complete yet, I find XUL/Gecko with a browser far > more useful than just a browser. Minimo ships without XUL support by default, hell, it doesn't even *build* with XUL support at the moment. But with 123.5MB of flash you can install firefox if you want. regards, Koen > > > >>On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 16:14, ext Brad Clements wrote: > > >>>So, can I count in a gecko/XUL engine in the production ROM release? > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCpJrLMkyGM64RGpERAowWAJsGSLL1Grz0MQ9ZjKFka1VjZOaIzwCgsjIG kmOB3cjrPbekd4paYVcem14= =HpUW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Xvnc vs Xnest (with screenshot :))
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Xvnc vs Xnest (with screenshot :))
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]