[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg
From: Kalle Vahlman kalle.vahlman at gmail.comDate: Tue Nov 29 14:37:17 EET 2005
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg
- Next message: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2005/11/29, Matthew Allum <mallum at gmail.com>: > "the 770 is not an embedded system" - OK :) You understand my point > though - we could argue all week on if my digitial watch for example > was a small computer or an embedded system. And that wouldn't resolve the real issues with the device which are the RAM shortage and less-than-optimal graphics performance wrt screen size. tar cfz - /var/lib/dpkg | wc -c gives somewhat less than one megabyte on the SDK, and I expect it to be about the same or less on the device (if it indeed had the dpkg stuff there, the product image does not currently). So we are talking about changing a rarely used utility to save less than one percent of the flash space? With modifications to who knows what amount of the packages included? Or is ipkg a drop-in replacement for dpkg, requiring no changes to build environments or the packages themselves? Could I "apt-get source foo" from a Debian repo, compile the package for ARM with an utility like dpkg-buildpackage and stuff it to the device like I can now (from the command line, and if AI would support real debs from it too)? -- Kalle Vahlman, zuh at iki.fi Powered by http://movial.fi
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg
- Next message: [maemo-developers] ipkg vs dpkg
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]