[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] why autotools?
From: Gustavo Barbieri barbieri at gmail.comDate: Sun Sep 25 22:41:16 EEST 2005
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] why autotools?
- Next message: [maemo-developers] why autotools?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/25/05, Asko Kauppi <askok at dnainternet.net> wrote: > > Scons can do the compile-time-dependency checks quite nicely, but > admitted, it's a different way of thinkin' altogether (build scripts > are all Python). Anyhow, the reasoning you guys are giving is > meaningful, although I still think use of autotools is slowing down > package creation unnecessarily. Good points, tho. > > btw, One neat thing I especially value in Scons is the way it > considers changes in compilation flags as a trigger for > recompilation. That is, it's much more clever than regular make, and > essentially takes away the need to 'make clean' every so often. I'm a SCons lover too, but I must admit it lacks a big library test as autotools have, things like test for gtk, sdl, alsa, ... must be coded by hand (however there are examples on scons.org/ wiki). We could change that proposing SCons replacements for current tutorials and even packages. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri --------------------------------------- Computer Engineer 2001 - UNICAMP GPSL - Grupo Pro Software Livre Cell..: +55 (19) 9165 8010 Jabber: gsbarbieri at jabber.org ICQ#: 17249123 MSN: barbieri at gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri GPG: 0xB640E1A2 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] why autotools?
- Next message: [maemo-developers] why autotools?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]