[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] why autotools?
From: Gustavo Barbieri barbieri at gmail.comDate: Mon Sep 26 20:29:20 EEST 2005
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] why autotools?
- Next message: [maemo-developers] why autotools?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/25/05, Timo Savola <tsavola at movial.fi> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 04:41:16PM -0300, Gustavo Barbieri wrote: > > On 9/25/05, Asko Kauppi <askok at dnainternet.net> wrote: > > > > > > Scons can do the compile-time-dependency checks quite nicely, but > > > admitted, it's a different way of thinkin' altogether (build scripts > > > are all Python). Anyhow, the reasoning you guys are giving is > > > meaningful, although I still think use of autotools is slowing down > > > package creation unnecessarily. Good points, tho. > > > > > > btw, One neat thing I especially value in Scons is the way it > > > considers changes in compilation flags as a trigger for > > > recompilation. That is, it's much more clever than regular make, and > > > essentially takes away the need to 'make clean' every so often. > > > > I'm a SCons lover too, but I must admit it lacks a big library test as > > autotools have, things like test for gtk, sdl, alsa, ... must be coded > > by hand (however there are examples on scons.org/ wiki). > > Autoconf's library tests can also be seen as a bad thing; my experience > is that autoconf often does unnecessary and slow tests. Configuration > can be a significant part of the build time of a small package. Also, at > least I haven't figured out a way to skip the C-compiler and C-library > related tests when building a C++ application that uses neither. > > While SCons is more advanced that make, it is still more of a low-level > tool than the autotools are. There should be a layer on top of SCons > that fills the gap: for example, interfacing with pkg-config. http://www.scons.org/cgi-bin/wiki/UsingPkgConfig basically it uses SCons ParseConfig(). > > We could change that proposing SCons replacements for current > > tutorials and even packages. > > Btw. before someone complains that maemo lacks SCons: the development > version (and the upcoming 1.0.2 release) of Scratchbox includes it. (It > needs patching to work in the Scratchbox environment because it runs the > build programs in a reconstructed environment with Scratchbox's vital > environment variables removed.) Great! -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri --------------------------------------- Computer Engineer 2001 - UNICAMP GPSL - Grupo Pro Software Livre Cell..: +55 (19) 9165 8010 Jabber: gsbarbieri at jabber.org ICQ#: 17249123 MSN: barbieri at gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri GPG: 0xB640E1A2 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] why autotools?
- Next message: [maemo-developers] why autotools?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]