[maemo-developers] DSP vs CPU for multimedia, Re: [maemo-developers] Audio enabled dev-platform?
From: Frantisek Dufka dufkaf at seznam.czDate: Thu Jan 12 16:33:20 EET 2006
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Audio enabled dev-platform?
- Next message: DSP vs CPU for multimedia,Re: [maemo-developers] Audio enabled dev-platform?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
BTW, did you think about using main CPU for decoding multimedia too? I was a bit shocked when playing the Ice Age trailer and saw in load plugin that main CPU is completely idle and both video and audio is decoded by DSP. I have no benchmarks or practical experience so far but from the documentation about C55x and ARM926TEJ it looks like the main cpu with edsp instructions could do similar work in similar speed as DSP does. If multimedia jobs could be distributed across both cpus (like dsp doing audio and color conversion into framebuffer, mpu decoding video) we could see higher resolution or frame rates. Is the gstreamer framework able to support more implementations for same codec (DSP vs CPU) and chose one based on priority? Will the stuff you are talking about releasing in future be enough for hacking in this area? Frantisek Devesh Kothari wrote: > improving multimedia support is one of priority area. I hope we are able > to push that out. Just to let you know we are working on it :) AFAIK it > is mostly issues related to redistribution of the DSP side stuff (even > in binary) which would enable the layer below DSPGateway. > > Devesh >
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Audio enabled dev-platform?
- Next message: DSP vs CPU for multimedia,Re: [maemo-developers] Audio enabled dev-platform?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]