[maemo-developers] DSP vs CPU for multimedia, Re: [maemo-developers] Audio enabled dev-platform?
From: Ralph Giles giles at xiph.orgDate: Thu Jan 12 18:43:56 EET 2006
- Previous message: DSP vs CPU for multimedia,Re: [maemo-developers] Audio enabled dev-platform?
- Next message: DSP vs CPU for multimedia, Re: [maemo-developers] Audio enabled dev-platform?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 04:42:38PM +0200, Devesh Kothari wrote: > But I think it should still be possible to construct a gstreamer pipeline > which would for example do ogg decoding on arm side and feed to the > DSP PCM sink or something. But I am just reasonably guessing :) This is my understanding as well. If the DSP is configured to control the audio hardware, it's easier to have it handle at least pcm playback, but one can make a sink plugin that takes data at just about any stage of decompression and handles the rest on the dsp. I imagine it's also possible to write plugins that only offload some of their processing to the dsp and do the rest on the arm. > You can hack I guess even today, but you would have to try it on the > real product. You cant try it on the developer rootfs, which gives you > a lot many other tools too, which ease development and hacking. FWIW, I tried this a few weeks ago, trying to build a vorbis plugin against both upstream gstreamer-0.8 and the version in the maemo repository, but I couldn't get gstreamer to recognize the new plugin. If anyone gets this working, please let me know! -r
- Previous message: DSP vs CPU for multimedia,Re: [maemo-developers] Audio enabled dev-platform?
- Next message: DSP vs CPU for multimedia, Re: [maemo-developers] Audio enabled dev-platform?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]