[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] neat device
From: John Meacham john at repetae.netDate: Thu Mar 30 11:32:12 EEST 2006
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] neat device
- Next message: [maemo-developers] neat device
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 10:52:28AM +0300, Kalle Vahlman wrote: > On 3/30/06, John Meacham <john at repetae.net> wrote: > [snip memory rant and offensive remarks about the VKB] > > So I whipped up a little X keyboard which uses a more reasonable tens of > > k of RAM, > > So you "whipped up" handwriting and word prediction too? How cool! > > (hint: if you start dissing something, please at least look at its > features before calling it demeaning names) hrm? sorry, I was being tounge-in-cheek there a bit. no dissing intended. hildon-input-method is certainly more powerful in many ways than what I have in mind. I'd very much like to see input options flourish though. > > Also, what keeps respawning the hildon-input-method? > > I'd guess the dsmetool. kay. I will look into that. there appears to be both a hildon-input-method.so shared module which I am guessing is the gtk-immodule itself. There is also the hildon-input-method program which is always running in the background. I take it the source to both of those is closed? (the version that comes on the device that is). As far as I can tell, from observing X traffic, the so module communicates with the already running input method program. perhaps the so module could be modified to only start the input method program when needed and kill it after some amount of inactivity? John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] neat device
- Next message: [maemo-developers] neat device
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]