[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Changes to GTK
From: David D. Hagood wowbagger at sktc.netDate: Wed May 31 14:36:06 EEST 2006
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Changes to GTK
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Changes to GTK
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Koen Kooi wrote: > Ehm..... Shouldn't e-mails containing crap^H^H^H^Hstuff like this be > discarded? With stuff like gmane, google-groups and list archives > maemo/nokia is in for a world of hurt, legally speaking. > > regards, > > Koen > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFEfX01MkyGM64RGpERAia+AKCCufGm5KmaP+Bck98/ln4mGx1lUACeLgB6 > 2pLCcNmXxeFKKxAmsJsG3Ac= > =bXC1 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > ___ One could equally gripe about your PGP signature - is a trivial mail like this really deserving of being cryptographically signed? Of course, you are set up to sign ALL your mail. Well, guess what - many unfortunate people, due to lawyers, SarbOx, ITAR, and other laws get those sort of "legal warts" added to their emails at work (I am unfortunately one of them, but am currently sending this from my home account). They cannot do anything about it - the wart is added as a matter of corporate policy at the corporate mail server at the corporate firewall, the corporate lawyers insist upon it, and there is no way an individual is going to get that changed. So you either live with it, and don't contribute to the list clutter by commenting upon it, or you ban all such individuals - and thus ban any company with such laws from participating in Maemo development.
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Changes to GTK
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Changes to GTK
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]