[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Bugzilla modules and components hierarchy notvery easy
From: Jakub.Pavelek at nokia.com Jakub.Pavelek at nokia.comDate: Fri Nov 17 13:20:17 EET 2006
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Bugzilla modules and components hierarchy not very easy
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Bugzilla modules and components hierarchy notvery easy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, I'm happy this is not just my impression. We encourage the use of Maemo bugzilla, and internal Nokia developers spend time looking after the bugs, but the bugzilla setup is not suitable. There is no way I could make a query that would return bugs related to my area - I have to search all and hand-pick from there. Plus all the other problems José already described. Would someone start a WIKI with proposed structure so that people can comment on it? Or some other idea how to intitate the change? Br, --jakub >-----Original Message----- >From: maemo-developers-bounces at maemo.org >[mailto:maemo-developers-bounces at maemo.org] On Behalf Of ext >José Dapena Paz >Sent: 17 November, 2006 01:13 >To: maemo-developers at maemo.org >Subject: [maemo-developers] Bugzilla modules and components >hierarchy notvery easy > > Hi, > > Mmm well, the subject is very descriptive. I feel a bit >lost in maemo bugzilla (http://bugs.maemo.org). I've been >issuing some bugs last days, but it's not easy to decide the >module they should go. > > First point is all that "haf" thing. It's where >hildon-libs, python and osso live, but, not very intuitive. >Many important modules are there in bugzilla (hildon-libs, >sapwood, osso-application-installer, ...). > > But the most annoying thing is not finding the proper >module for a bug. >I suppose bugzilla should encourage people to submit the >issues they find. And a good way to encourage people is making >it very easy to send good reports to the proper box: > * Errors in custom gtk+. Should they go to the upstream >gtk+ bugzilla? > * Should bugs found in maemo-af-desktop svn module >should go to bugzilla "haf/desktop" component? Shouln't it be >better that maemo af desktop would be a product, with >components like "status bar", "navigator", "home", etc.? > * If we assume an "applications" product, shouldn't >application installer, control panel, etc, go there? Or, most >likely, shouldn't they be products themselves? > > I think Gnome bugzilla is at least easier to browse >(names of modules in cvs are equal to names of modules in >bugzilla, products are more or less equivalent to projects, etc). > > These are some problems (of course, dramaticed ;) I >found working with maemo bugzilla. I think that, now that >there aren't too much bugs registered, it's a good time to >recategorize bugs, and fix this, as it seems a bit messy now. > >-- >José Dapena Paz <jdapena at igalia.com> >Igalia >_______________________________________________ >maemo-developers mailing list >maemo-developers at maemo.org >https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers >
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Bugzilla modules and components hierarchy not very easy
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Bugzilla modules and components hierarchy notvery easy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]