[maemo-developers] Software categories (was do we need garage sandbox repos?)
From: Eero Tamminen eero.tamminen at nokia.comDate: Mon Aug 13 15:32:01 EEST 2007
- Previous message: Software categories (was do we need garage sandbox repos?)
- Next message: Software categories (was do we need garage sandbox repos?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, ext Neil MacLeod wrote: > Having downloaded a handful of debs and viewed the info with "dpkg --info <deb>" > it's clear that by "category" I mean "Section", eg. ncurses-bin appears in > the category "cli" within Application Manager while the deb has a "Section" > value set to "user/cli". > > I'm all for standardisation with Debian if that makes life easier, however > the "authoritative list of sections" are: > > admin, base, comm, contrib, devel, doc, editors, electronics, embedded, games, > gnome, graphics, hamradio, interpreters, kde, libs, libdevel, mail, math, misc, > net, news, non-free, oldlibs, otherosfs, perl, python, science, shells, sound, > tex, text, utils, web, x11 > > and my immediate observation is that some of the Sections may not be appropriate > for such prominent display/filtering in a consumer oriented device (eg. comm, net, > doc, utils and x11 for starters), If there's nothing inside given section, it should not be shown, similarly to menus. It could be that Debian sections should have a similar revamp as what they're doing for their menu policy... Btw. I'm not really sure what or whether there's a formal mapping between Debian sections and menu policy, maybe some debian developer could clarify this? > and that if we decide to follow the Debian Section naming convention > the Application Manager will need to "pretty print" the output (ie. > games -> Games). > > While standardisation may be a good thing, for a consumer oriented device it > may be more appropriate to consider a consumer-friendly categorisation/Section > naming scheme in place of, or in addition to, the standard Debian Sections. > Given the terse and somewhat unfriendly nature of the Debian Sections, I > strongly suggest that we consider a more consumer-friendly alternative, > perhaps by having the Application Manager implement a Debian->Maemo Section > mapping, ie comm -> Coummunications, doc -> Office, games -> Games, web > -> Communications etc. etc. This process is called translation. :-) These names are gobblegook for people who don't understand English. - Eero
- Previous message: Software categories (was do we need garage sandbox repos?)
- Next message: Software categories (was do we need garage sandbox repos?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]