[maemo-developers] Software categories
From: Marius Vollmer marius.vollmer at nokia.comDate: Tue Aug 14 18:00:37 EEST 2007
- Previous message: Software categories
- Next message: Software categories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"ext Guillem Jover" <guillem.jover at nokia.com> writes: > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 16:03:13 +0300, Marius Vollmer wrote: > >> Using tags instead of the section is just another implementation of >> the same feature. Had I used tags, we still would have to have a >> special maemo specific tag that controls visibility in the AM, and >> people would still be diverging from Debian. > > I disagree. You'd be using tags to filter what you show. Probably > we'd iwant a new tag like uitoolkit::hildon, but that's not maemo > specific, and it's not needed to start using them with the current > tagged data. You could show only packages matching a set of tags, a > starting point could be for example: > > role::program && interface::x11 && \ > (uitoolkit::hildon || uitoolkit::gtk || uitoolkit::sdl || uitoolkit::xlib) Right, that makes a lot of sense. But still, it is a rather indirect way of controlling visibility in the AM. What about packages like language packs that enhance the system in some subtle way? It is very important whether or not a package is shown in the AM and I think we should let a package declare itself visible in a very direct and dedicated way. What about a "audience" tag? The default filter rule could be audience::enduser or something and we could have others like audience::poweruser, audience::admin, audience::hacker, etc.
- Previous message: Software categories
- Next message: Software categories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]