[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] New list spin-off?
From: Kemal Hadimli disqkk at gmail.comDate: Mon Feb 5 19:41:54 EET 2007
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] New list spin-off?
- Next message: [maemo-developers] New list spin-off?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ok. my preferences: lists: keep them as they are. reply-to: mangle them tags: don't care if you mangle the reply-to headers. keep them if not. best regards, kemal On 2/5/07, Ed Okerson <ed at okerson.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:55:12AM -0600, Ed Okerson wrote: > >> And reply to all causes the original poster to get two copies of the > >> mail, > >> one of which is not handled by list filters because it did not go > >> through > >> the list. It is a royal pain to reply to all and cut and past the list > >> address from the cc to the to line and clean it up so as to not cause > >> too > >> much pain for others. 99% of the replys to list mail should go to the > >> list, so that means either causing extra traffic for people who actually > >> post to the list, or extra work when replying to the list. > > > > Only for people with inferior mailers ;-) > > > > Yay for Mutt and single-keystroke reply-to-list! > > > >> I agree, > >> change default reply-to to the list address. > > > > I think I could deal with both, but if the mailing list software mangles > > the reply-to header, sooner or later I *will* post a personal message to > > the list by accident. > > You are right, I just did not have the list module installed in the > reader, it works better now. I no longer care. :) -- Kemal
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] New list spin-off?
- Next message: [maemo-developers] New list spin-off?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]