[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
From: Siarhei Siamashka siarhei.siamashka at gmail.comDate: Sun Jan 14 20:43:22 EET 2007
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sunday 14 January 2007 20:11, Frantisek Dufka wrote: > Marius Gedminas wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 07:53:06PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:11:37AM +0200, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > >>> Also Nokia 770 runs not at 220MHz as stated on your page, but at > >>> something closer to 250MHz as shown by this test code program > >>> (and confirmed to be actually 252MHz by somebody from Nokia > >>> on #maemo about half a year ago). > >> > >> So http://maemo.org/faq/faq.html#faq-N10129 is lying? Well, if I were to create a conspiracy theory, I would suggest that it could be done on purpose to make N800 look like a bigger improvement when comparing it to 770 ;-) But most likely it is just a typo, a lot of new docs became available lately, so they may contain some minor inaccuracies. > > The OMAP1710 page from Texas Instruments also claims 220 MHz is the > > maximum frequency: > > Check /proc/omap_clock on device, it says 252Mhz for both ARM and DSP core. Hmm, interesting. Can anybody check /proc/omap_clock on N800 device? I'm particularly curious about DSP clock frequency (as it can be actually lower than on 770).
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]